FK I'm Crackproof

Some analysis regarding the killer's use of the letters 'F' & 'K', and related thoughts. I don't buy into it, but it's certainly on topic.

http://www.zodiacciphers.com/1/post/2012/12/fk-im-crackproof.html

TagsGreen
Michael Cole

18 comments

  1. LD 29 December, 2012 at 16:33 Reply

    The Zodiac is an application. The letters F and K produce ODC 13 and 3, hence 133 and 7. 13 is the presidency of the Mormon church, and 3 and 7 are Druid primes. Again, and realize you folks are fighting this, but the Zodiac was a LDS application. There was no single individual on this. It was a matrix project engineered to test one of several occult rendition applications. Don’t fight it. Let this sink in.

    • LD 29 December, 2012 at 17:33

      Correct. This overwhelmingly contravenes what we understand to have been a lone wolf. It was cohort of wolves. Take your time with this information. You are not going to understand this in 5 minutes. Jack the ripper was also an application, one that lofted Atramental Lodge 23 in the US. It was a black rendition the target of which was Mary Ann Nichols. she was pregnant, and her son was TE Lawrence.

  2. Alex L 29 December, 2012 at 22:36 Reply

    As i said before, i think people try and over complicate this case with outlandish theories, with everything from Mountains in SF to a radium angle. I don’t know if this is because Z sent complex ciphers, was clearly of above average IQ etc, so maybe they think he has hidden messages in everything he did, like his ciphers. Take the Stine shooting, classic example. There are a number of theories assossiated with that murder, with people claiming the words ‘Washington & Maple’ have significance, the loaction Z originally asked to be taken to. “Zodiac is telling us he lives in Washington now, or has in the past, but he’s actually revealing he’s Canadian (Maple St, ie, Maple Leaf).” say one theory. That could be why he chouse that location, or it could be because Washington & Maple St is just around the corner, (One street over on Jackson) from the enterance to Julias Kahn playground in the Presidio, a quick and easy eacspe route into the darkness away from the streets, and which incidentally, we know he used to make his escape even thought he had to walk a significant extra distance down Jackson St to get to the Presidio.

    • Zodiac Revisited 29 December, 2012 at 22:42

      In my experience, people (myself included, I suppose) want just enough complexity to make their respective positions viable. In some ways, it reminds me of George Carlin’s observations about driving: anybody who drives faster than you is a “maniac;” anybody who drives slower is an “idiot.”

    • LD 30 December, 2012 at 00:47

      Look, you’ve got a good mind. Learn the ODC and this will give you depth on your research. Regarding Washington and Maple, what I can tell you about this is there is actually more to be understood about these words than most people can handle. There’s science, then there’s pseudo science. The former will educate you. The latter will blow your mind. Washington and Maple are the latter.

      Who is the computer engineer here? If you’ve got courage I will give you a project to write that will transform your understanding of the zodiac. Let me know. Also, be aware this site is being read stealth.

  3. Alex L 29 December, 2012 at 23:22 Reply

    Yeah i suppose thats true and a fair analogy to use. Every person is different and will see things from their own perspective with their own opinions. I may say the car was light purple, you may say it is blue etc. But at least you acknowledge and are aware of a theory being complex but making sence and plausable, to one that labels people kooks. Lets hope that we find out many of the answers to many of the questions one day in the future by discovering his identity. You never know, maybe someone will come foreward with a set of car keys and wallet withPaul Stines ID in it that they found among their Uncles/Brother/Fathers possessions. Usually the best took for catching a murderer in this day and age is DNA, but i think if wouldn’t be good enough in this case, because if a DNA match came back from a Z letter that wasn’t who people wanted it to be, they would instantly protest ‘Two involved, one killer, one writer’, even thought that theory has been proven wrong.

  4. Alex Lewis 3 January, 2013 at 01:59 Reply

    I strongly believe that Lawrence Kane was The Zodiac. Every thing about Kane fits. The link to a web page i have created detailing the reasons for Kane being Zodia is…

    http://wp.me/2ZA7s

    Please feel free to leave a comment weather it be a compliment or criticism. Anyone who has any other information regarding Kane that may be significant, my email address is at the bottom of the page.

  5. Harry Horton 4 January, 2013 at 23:06 Reply

    Why add the negative stuff about Tom at the end? I just do not see how this adds to your case against Kane? Such behavior has become common practice with people who have a favorite suspect and it boggles my mind? Why go so negative when it will gain you nothing? Just friendly advice and my opinion.
    Otherwise, nice rundown of your interpretation on the possibility of Larry Kane being Z.

    • Alex Lewis 7 January, 2013 at 11:22

      Harry, thank you for the positive comments. I have taken the section pertaining to Tom off of my page because, as you are correct in saying, it has nothing to do with my opinion on Lawrence Kane being Zodiac.

    • Alex Lewis 7 January, 2013 at 12:36

      And just to eloberate on a few things. I totally understand what you mean by people having ‘Favorite Suspects’, but i promote Kane simply due to research done on all top Zodiac suspects, and Kane being the only one that seems to have far more evidence for, than evidence against. My opinion is objective, non-biased and i have no personal agenda or reason to claim Kane was Zodiac. As i am the first to admit, the evidence against Kane is circumstantial. But the evidence against all the suspects is Circumstantial. However, there are facts known about the oter suspects, or evidence to show, that suggests they were not Zodiac (ie, Allen’s DNA & prints don’t match. Gaikowski’s former collegue has produced letters Gaik sent him from Albany, NY, in 68 at the time of The Lake Herman Rd shooting, etc etc). Lawrence Kane is the one suspect i could not find any clear reason or evidence to eliminate him, and upon a more detailed investigation, found a lot to implicate him.

  6. Alex Lewis 11 January, 2013 at 12:16 Reply

    Well Kane was a loner, and the handful of people that did know him said he was always gaurded and secretive in his ways and dealings with other people. I’ve never come across any evidence that sugested Kane knew Davis. Kane was incapable of forming adult relationships and leived with his mother untill she died when he was 59. So, whilst i havn’t seen evidence either way to suggest the two knew each other, based on what i have learned regarding Kane, the chances of him joining a group like the Manson Family when he couldn’t form one two one relationships and seemd to not turst anybody and let them into ‘his world’ so to speak.

    • Alex 1 September, 2015 at 20:20

      It’s Kane! Hi Larry, your posting well for a man who passed away on May 20 of 2010 at the age of 86.

      Or are you trying to communicate from beyond the grave, or from beyond the realm of stupidity?

      ps. At least check He’s still alive before posting as him, it’s the least you could do?

  7. Jon Day 19 June, 2014 at 05:29 Reply

    Isn’t it possible that the line should read “closeing in on me, FK” as opposed to “closeing in on me, FK I’m crackproof”? It’s not as if the Zodiac is a shining example of grammatical prowess. Therefore we can ignore that the K is lowercase, and we can ignore the lack of a second delineating comma or period between “Fk” and “crackproof”. Just as we can ignore the mispelling of “closeing”. It would be difficult to make the claim “but the letter K is lowercase”, without ignoring the fact that the word closing is spelled “closeing”. Perhaps F. and K. are the initials of the Zodiac’s true identity, and he presented it in this odd way to not be overt (as being vague seems his style).

    • Alex L 23 July, 2014 at 22:27

      Could stand for ‘Fouke knows’ as in “Fouke knows I’m crackproof.” What is the basis for such a theory? Well, firstly, the sentence before it offers this possibility when he says “THERE ARE REPORTS city police pig cops are closeing in on me.” He could just say something like THERE ARE REPORTS pig cops are closeing in on me” if he wanted. But he specifically states that the cops in question are City police pig cops, the City, obviously, being San Francisco and the cops being Officers of the SFPD. The only time that Zodiac ever encounters a cop in person happens on Jackson St with Patrol Officer Fouke. He’s the only cop that saw Zodiac’s face unobstructed and in a well lit street. Don Fouke, as it happens, is a City cop and also just so happens to let Zodiac continue on his merry way after encountering him and claimed it was due to an error in suspect’s race given as Black Male Adult at the time he spotted the White Male. I never believed that claim and in 2007 Armond Pelissetti cemented my belief in this by declaring that as he arrived on scene he quickly ushered three children back to their house’s front alcove and had a very brief interaction with them in which he says he found out the shooter was not black, but white, and in response to learning this said: “I couldn’t get to my radio fast enough to let everyone else know.” Now he’s broadcast to ‘everyone else’ responding that the suspect is White, Fouke and Zelms have no cause or reason to let the white guy pass by based on his race.
      Could Fouke have allowed him to continue on by because he recognised him as someone prominent, someone who he felt was beyond approach? Did Zodiac mean he was Crackproof because of who he is and not, as some assume, because of how clever he was? “Fk I’m Crackproof” would again fit with ‘Fouke knows’ because the F is capitalised as it would be if it was the initial of someone’s name, such as Fouke. The k that follows the F is not capitalised and nor should it be if it represents ‘Fouke knows.’
      No way to prove this obviously and it’s simply one theory, but one that is just as likely as any other in my opinion because until Zodiac himself comes forward and categorically says it was a reference to *Theory B* then any claim made as to it’s meaning will remain flying under the banner of ‘Speculation.’

Leave a reply